Effectiveness of Breast Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Screening : A Systematic Review

Hotman P. Pangaribuan

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indonesia and has the highest mortality rate in women. Nowadays, the primary prevention is not clear yet to prevent the breast cancer. Secondary prevention with radiological modality is the only option to decrease the mortality of breast cancer. This study aims to identify ultrasound effectiveness and accuracy as a screening modality for early detection of breast cancer. Methods: A systematic review was analyzed using PRISMA without a meta-analysis method on articles published in 2014-2024. Articles searches were conducted using PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar Database. Result: Based on the search results, seven eligible articles met the criteria for analysis. We found consistent evidence in 5 studies that breast cancer screening using ultrasound has high sensitivity (range sensitivity 68.9%-100%) and accuracy (range accuracy 0.687-0.999) compared to mammography alone. Breast ultrasound specificity is lower than mammography, ranging from 22% to 99.9%. The positive predictive value ranges from 4.3%-70%, and the negative predictive value of breast ultrasound ranges from 61.2%-100%. Conclusion: Breast Ultrasound can be an option as a breast cancer screening modality, especially in young women with dense breasts. It can be used in health facilities where mammography is unavailable.


 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory, Cancer Study. World Health Organization. 2022
2. Birnbaum J.K, Duggan C. Early detection and treatment strategies for breast cancer in lowincome and upper middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(8): e885–e893
3. Tiomaida Seviana, Farida Sibuea. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2022. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2023
4. Iacob, R; Iacob, E.R, et al. Evaluating the Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Country.A Comprehensive Narrative Review. 2024, 11, 262.
5. Wang, Y; Li, Y; Song, Y; Chen, C, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer among Chinese Women with suspected breast lesion: A Prospective Trial. Wiley. 2022; 13;3145-3151.
6. Omidiji, O; Campbell, P; Irurhe, N. Breast Cancer Screening in a resource poor country: ultrasound versus mammography. Ghana Medical Journal. 2017; 51:6-12
7. Berg, W.A, Bandos, A.I, Mendelson, E.B, et al. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis from ACRIN 6666. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016; 108(4): djv 367
8. Sun L, Qi M, Cui X, Song Q. The Clinical Application of Combinced Ultrasound, Mammography, and Tumor Markers in Screening Breast Cancer among High-Risk Women. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2022
9. Shen S, Zhou Y, Zhang B, Duan X, et al. A multi-centre Randomise Trial Comparing Ultrasound vs Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer in High-Risk Chinese Women. British Journal of Cancer. 2015; 112: 998-1004
10. Cortesi L, Canossi B, Battista R, et al. Breast Ultrasonography in The Screening Protocol for Women at Hereditary-Famillial Risk of Breast Cancer: Has the time to rethink the role of Breast Ultrasound according to different risk categories?. International Journal of Cancer. 2019; 144(5): 1001-1009
11. Ghameian N, Tehrani N, Nabahati M. Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasonography and Their BI-RAD in Detection of Breast Malignancy. Caspain Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021; 12(4):573-579
12. Candelaria R, Hwang L. Bouchard R, Whitman G. Breast Ultrasound: Current Concepts. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI. 2013;15:1917
13. Disha E.D, Keliu S.M, Ymeri H, Kutlovci A. Comparative Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasound in Women with Breast Symptoms According to Age And Breasat Densitiy. Bosnian Journal Of Basic Medical Science. 2009; 9(2):131-136
14. Chen H, Zhou J, Chen Q, Deng Y. Comparison of The Sensitivity of Mammography, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Combination of these Modalities for The Detection of Small (<2 cm) Breast Cancer. Medicine. 2021; 100:26
15. Girardi V, Tonegutti M, Ciatto S, Bonetti F. Breast Ultrasound in 22131 Asymtomatic Women with Negative Mammography. The Breast. 2013; 22: 806-909
16. Buchberger W, Gritsch SG, Knapp R, Gautsch K. Combined Screening with Mammography and Ultrasound in a Population Based Screening Program. Eropean Journal of Radiology. 2018;101:24-29
17. Apestugia L, Pina LJ. Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Breast Lesion. Insight Imaging. 2011; 2:493-500
18. Scogins M.E, Fox P.S, Kuerer H.M, Rauch G.M, et al. Correlation Between Sonographic Findings and Clinicopathologic and Biologic Features of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in 691 Patients. AJR. 2015;204.
19. Parmar J, Choudhary S, Zope , et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and Mammographic in Young Women with Radiographically Dense Breasat. Arch Clin Biomed Res. 2022; 6(2): 308-321

Authors

Hotman P. Pangaribuan
[email protected] (Primary Contact)

Article Details